Enrage- to fill with rage.

Synonyms- aggravate, irritate, inflame, embitter, infuriate, exasperate.

Antonyms– pacify, tame, mollify, allay, quiet.

Meaning of given words:

Alleviate- to make something less grievous.

Moderate- average in amount, intensity, quality, or degree.

Placate- to soothe or mollify especially by concessions.

If two subjects are joined by – Not only …. but also, Neither…... nor, Either …... or then, the verb always follows its nearest subject. Hence, replace “was” with “were” as the main subject is plural in nature.

Replace ‘had to being’ given in the sentence with ‘have to be’ to make the sentence grammatically and contextually correct.

‘Have to be’ is used to say that something is required or necessary.

In this sentence, the issue is about compulsory vaccination. Therefore, it makes sense to start with "The issue of"

The first part of the sentence is given: "The issue of". Now, let's consider what makes sense after this part:

P. "compulsory vaccination is difficult" — This makes sense as the immediate next part, because it follows the "The issue of" in a logical way.

R. "because the governments need to consider" — This part explains why the issue of compulsory vaccination is difficult. The conjunction "because" implies an explanation or reason is about to be given, so it follows well from part P.

Q. "multiple interests all protected by human" — This part gives us the specifics of what the governments need to consider, i.e., multiple interests protected by human rights law.

S. "rights law and strike a fair balance between them" — This completes part Q, and explains the governments' challenge of balancing these rights.

Thus, the correct order of the parts of the sentence is (a) PRQS.

"Take up" is the appropriate phrase, meaning to begin or turn one's attention to something, in this case, the court beginning to hear a case on a specified date.

"Take up" means to start or proceed to deal with.

Meanings of other given words:

"Take to" suggests developing a liking for or habitually starting to do something, which doesn't fit the context of a court hearing.

"Take on" means to undertake or begin to deal with a challenge, but "take up" is more specific to starting a process or addressing an issue.

"Take over" means to assume control of something, which is not appropriate for the context of scheduling a hearing.

The correct sentence is “A successful man is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks others have thrown at him”. The correct order is RPQS.

• "R" introduces the concept of laying a firm foundation with the bricks.

• "P" follows to describe the person as successful, which provides further context to the situation.

• "Q" then comes in, emphasizing the bricks thrown at the person by others, connecting back to the idea introduced in "R".

• Finally, "S" concludes the sentence by highlighting the resilience and ability of the person to utilize the challenges they face to build success.

Direct Speech- it means reporting the message of the speaker in the exact words as spoken by him.

Indirect Speech- It is speech which tells you what someone said, but does not use the person's actual word.

Given sentence is an example of direct speech.

While changing direct speech into indirect speech following rules are to be followed:

Say/said remains the same in the indirect speech and 'say to' is changed to 'tell' and 'said to' is changed to 'told in the indirect speech.

“You” in the reported speech changes to “he”.

The correct spelling is 'Impractical'. So, the incorrectly spelt word is 'Impracticle'.

Meanings of the given options:

Flawless: means without any blemishes, defects, or imperfections. It's often used to describe something or someone that is perfect or near perfect.

Rudimentary: word refers to something basic or elementary. It can describe something in an undeveloped, incomplete, or very basic form.

Primitive: refers to something that is simple or basic, not sophisticated or advanced.

Impractical: refers to something that is not sensible or realistic in the context of a particular situation.

Man of straw- someone who has a weak character.

Use in a sentence- He was accused by his opponents of being a man of straw and lacking in decisiveness.

In the sentence "Dinesh asked Gautam about he was coming or not," the segment "about he was" is incorrect because it doesn't form a grammatically correct indirect question.

In English, when you're relaying a question someone else asked, you usually use "if" or "whether."

The word "about" is not used in this context to introduce an indirect question. Therefore, "about he was" is the segment that contains the grammatical error, making "(b) about he was" the correct answer.