Verify mobile number to view the solution
Solutions
Understanding the Logic Problem
This question is a classic example of a syllogism problem in logical reasoning. We are given two statements and two conclusions. Our task is to determine which conclusions logically follow from the given statements, assuming the statements are absolutely true, even if they contradict common knowledge.
The key phrase in the statements is "Only a few". In logical reasoning based on syllogisms, the phrase "Only a few A are B" has a specific meaning:
- Some A are B.
- Some A are not B.
Let's break down the given statements using this understanding.
Analyzing the Statements
We have two statements:
Statement 1: Only a few Adults are Plumbers.
Based on the definition of "Only a few", this statement implies:
- Some Adults are Plumbers.
- Some Adults are not Plumbers.
Statement 2: Only a few Plumbers are Taxi drivers.
Again, applying the definition of "Only a few", this statement implies:
- Some Plumbers are Taxi drivers.
- Some Plumbers are not Taxi drivers.
Evaluating the Conclusions
Now, let's examine each conclusion to see if it logically follows from the statements.
Conclusion I: Some Adults are Taxi drivers.
This conclusion attempts to establish a direct relationship between "Adults" and "Taxi drivers". The statements provide links between "Adults" and "Plumbers", and between "Plumbers" and "Taxi drivers".
- From Statement 1, we know some Adults are Plumbers and some are not.
- From Statement 2, we know some Plumbers are Taxi drivers and some are not.
While it is possible that some of the "Adults who are Plumbers" might also be among the "Plumbers who are Taxi drivers", the statements do not guarantee this connection. There is no definite link established between the set of "Adults" and the set of "Taxi drivers" that guarantees "Some Adults are Taxi drivers" must be true. It's a possibility, but not a certainty based *only* on the given statements.
Therefore, Conclusion I does not logically follow from the statements.
Conclusion II: All Plumbers can never be Taxi drivers.
This conclusion is about the relationship between "Plumbers" and "Taxi drivers". Let's look at Statement 2 again:
Statement 2: Only a few Plumbers are Taxi drivers.
As we established, "Only a few Plumbers are Taxi drivers" means:
- Some Plumbers are Taxi drivers.
- Some Plumbers are not Taxi drivers.
The fact that "Some Plumbers are not Taxi drivers" is true directly means that it is impossible for *all* Plumbers to be Taxi drivers. If even one Plumber is not a Taxi driver, then the statement "All Plumbers are Taxi drivers" is false. The conclusion "All Plumbers can never be Taxi drivers" is equivalent to saying "It is impossible for all Plumbers to be Taxi drivers". Since we know that some Plumbers are not Taxi drivers, it is indeed impossible for all of them to be Taxi drivers.
Therefore, Conclusion II logically follows from Statement 2.
Summary of Conclusions
Based on our analysis:
- Conclusion I: Some Adults are Taxi drivers - Does NOT follow.
- Conclusion II: All Plumbers can never be Taxi drivers - Does Follow.
Thus, only Conclusion II logically follows from the given statements.
| Statement/Conclusion |
Analysis |
Logical Follows? |
| Statement 1: Only a few Adults are Plumbers. |
Some Adults are Plumbers; Some Adults are not Plumbers. |
N/A |
| Statement 2: Only a few Plumbers are Taxi drivers. |
Some Plumbers are Taxi drivers; Some Plumbers are not Taxi drivers. |
N/A |
| Conclusion I: Some Adults are Taxi drivers. |
No guaranteed link between Adults and Taxi drivers from statements. |
No |
| Conclusion II: All Plumbers can never be Taxi drivers. |
'Some Plumbers are not Taxi drivers' from Statement 2 implies 'All Plumbers cannot be Taxi drivers'. |
Yes |
Revision Table: Syllogism Key Terms
| Term |
Meaning in Syllogism (Only a few logic) |
| Only a few A are B |
Means "Some A are B" AND "Some A are not B". |
| Some A are B |
Existence of at least one element that is A and B. Does not exclude the possibility of 'All A are B' or 'No A are B' unless other statements/context restrict it. |
| All A are B |
Every element of set A is also in set B. |
| No A are B |
No element of set A is in set B. |
Additional Information: Logic Reasoning Tips
Here are some tips for solving logic reasoning and syllogism problems, especially those involving "Only a few":
- Understand "Only a few": Remember its dual meaning: "Some" and "Some not". This is crucial for correct deductions.
- Avoid Assumptions: Only use the information given in the statements. Do not use your outside knowledge or make assumptions based on common sense.
- Draw Venn Diagrams (Optional): For some, visualizing the sets and their relationships using Venn diagrams can be helpful, but be careful with "Only a few" as it represents overlapping areas and non-overlapping areas within the first set.
- Analyze Conclusions Carefully: Check if the conclusion is *necessarily* true based *only* on the statements. If there is even one possible scenario where the conclusion is false, it does not logically follow.
- "Can never be": This phrase means "It is impossible for". To prove "All X can never be Y", you need to show that "Some X are not Y" is true based on the statements.