Verify mobile number to view the solution
Solutions
Understanding Fundamental Rights in India: The K.S. Puttaswamy Case
This solution aims to explain a key aspect of Indian constitutional law, specifically focusing on fundamental rights that are derived rather than explicitly stated. We will analyze the provided question and options to identify the correct fundamental right based on the landmark Supreme Court judgment mentioned.
Analysis of the Question's Core Concepts
The question asks us to identify a specific fundamental right. The key elements defining this right are:
- It is not explicitly enumerated as a separate article within Part III of the Indian Constitution.
- It is considered an intrinsic part derived from the foundational principles laid out in Articles 14, 19, and 21.
- A landmark judgment, K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, is cited as a crucial articulation of this right.
Evaluating the Options
Let's examine each option in light of the criteria mentioned in the question:
1. Right to Education
The Right to Education is now a fundamental right under Article 21A of the Constitution, added by the 86th Amendment Act, 2002. While derived from Article 21, it is now explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, which slightly differs from the question's premise of being 'not explicitly enumerated'.
2. Right to Privacy
The Right to Privacy was famously declared a fundamental right by a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court in the K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) case. The Court held that privacy is an intrinsic and inseparable part of rights guaranteed under Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) and also flows from the freedoms guaranteed under Article 19(1) (freedoms like speech and expression) and the equality principles of Article 14.
This aligns perfectly with the question's description: it's not explicitly listed as a separate article but is deeply rooted in Articles 14, 19, and 21, and was significantly shaped by the Puttaswamy judgment.
3. Right to Information
The Right to Information (RTI) is primarily derived from the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression under Article 19(1)(a). While the RTI Act, 2005, provides a legal framework, the Supreme Court has recognized it as a fundamental right stemming from Article 19(1)(a). However, the Puttaswamy case is specifically and most famously associated with the Right to Privacy.
4. Right to Livelihood
The Supreme Court, in cases predating Puttaswamy, has interpreted the Right to Life under Article 21 broadly to include the Right to Livelihood. This is crucial for a meaningful right to life. However, the Puttaswamy case's primary focus was the Right to Privacy.
Step-by-Step Explanation of the K.S. Puttaswamy Judgment
- Background: The K.S. Puttaswamy case challenged the constitutional validity of India's national biometric identification system, Aadhaar.
- The Court's Decision: A unanimous nine-judge bench ruled that the Right to Privacy is a fundamental right.
- Constitutional Basis: The judgment extensively discussed how privacy is intrinsic to the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21). It also found its foundations in dignity, liberty, and autonomy, which are linked to other fundamental rights like freedom of speech (Article 19) and equality (Article 14).
- Significance: This judgment affirmed that fundamental rights are not limited to those explicitly listed and that the Constitution's guarantees implicitly protect other essential human rights. The Right to Privacy is now considered a cornerstone of personal liberty in India.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis, the description provided in the question—a fundamental right not explicitly stated but derived from Articles 14, 19, and 21, and significantly articulated in the K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India judgment—points directly to the Right to Privacy.