Please wait...

Parajumbles Test 438
Menu grid icon
Result Result point icon
Parajumbles Test 438
  • Goals icon

    /

    Score
  • Trophy icon

    -

    Rank
White alarm icon Time Taken: -
Result frame illustration
  • Question 1/5
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Rearrange the following six sentences, (A), (B), (C), (D), (E) and (F), in a proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph, then answer the questions that follow.

    (A) Had it been not for them, Indian banks would have had their hands tied down.
    (B) Today, almost all the countries are facing the heat of recession.
    (C) One of these is the strict RBI and SEBI rules which regulated banking sector very efficiently.
    (D) This could have led to massive losses to them, which could have percolated to other sectors as well.
    (E) However, there are a few things which helped India in bouncing back from the state of recession.
    (F) Like others, India too has not been immune to the epidemic.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following sentences should be the THIRD after rearrangement?
    Solutions
    The correct logical order is BFECAD.
    While arranging sentences in a sequence, it is essential to understand the central theme first so that the related subthemes can be arranged accordingly. The first statement should be B which introduces the issue being discussed, which is the 'state of recession', a condition almost all countries are facing.
    Next should be statement F which talks about recession in the Indian context i.e. India has been affected as well but not as much as other countries.
    F should be followed by statement E which describes what separates India from other countries and helped her overcome the issue. This statement states 'a few things' which acts as an antecedent for 'one of these' stated in statement C. Also, statement C answers the question as to why India did not face the worst effects of recession. Hence, C follows. 'RBI and SEBI' stated in C serve as an antecedent for 'had it not been for them' stated in statement A, making C and A a mandatory pair, with statement A following statement C.
    'Have had their hands tied down' stated in A serves as an antecedent for 'this could have' stated in statement D. D follows A because it answers as to what helped Indian Banks avert losses during recession. Hence, D follows.
  • Question 2/5
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Rearrange the following six sentences, (A), (B), (C), (D), (E) and (F), in a proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph, then answer the questions that follow.
    (A) Had it been not for them, Indian banks would have had their hands tied down.
    (B) Today, almost all the countries are facing the heat of recession.
    (C) One of these is the strict RBI and SEBI rules which regulated banking sector very efficiently.
    (D) This could have led to massive losses to them, which could have percolated to other sectors as well.
    (E) However, there are a few things which helped India in bouncing back from the state of recession.
    (F) Like others, India too has not been immune to the epidemic.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following sentences should be the FIRST after rearrangement?
    Solutions
    The correct logical order is BFECAD.
    While arranging sentences in a sequence, it is essential to understand the central theme first so that the related subthemes can be arranged accordingly. The first statement should be B which introduces the issue being discussed, which is the 'state of recession', a condition almost all countries are facing.
    Next should be statement F which talks about recession in the Indian context i.e. India has been affected as well but not as much as other countries.
    F should be followed by statement E which describes what separates India from other countries and helped her overcome the issue. This statement states 'a few things' which acts as an antecedent for 'one of these' stated in statement C. Also, statement C answers the question as to why India did not face the worst effects of recession. Hence, C follows. 'RBI and SEBI' stated in C serve as an antecedent for 'had it not been for them' stated in statement A, making C and A a mandatory pair, with statement A following statement C.
    'Have had their hands tied down' stated in A serves as an antecedent for 'this could have' stated in statement D. D follows A because it answers as to what helped Indian Banks avert losses during recession. Hence, D follows.
  • Question 3/5
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Rearrange the following six sentences, (A), (B), (C), (D), (E) and (F), in a proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph, then answer the questions that follow.
    (A) Had it been not for them, Indian banks would have had their hands tied down.
    (B) Today, almost all the countries are facing the heat of recession.
    (C) One of these is the strict RBI and SEBI rules which regulated banking sector very efficiently.
    (D) This could have led to massive losses to them, which could have percolated to other sectors as well.
    (E) However, there are a few things which helped India in bouncing back from the state of recession.
    (F) Like others, India too has not been immune to the epidemic.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following sentences should be the SECOND after rearrangement?
    Solutions
    The correct logical order is BFECAD.
    While arranging sentences in a sequence, it is essential to understand the central theme first so that the related subthemes can be arranged accordingly. The first statement should be B which introduces the issue being discussed, which is the 'state of recession', a condition almost all countries are facing.
    Next should be statement F which talks about recession in the Indian context i.e. India has been affected as well but not as much as other countries.
    F should be followed by statement E which describes what separates India from other countries and helped her overcome the issue. This statement states 'a few things' which acts as an antecedent for 'one of these' stated in statement C. Also, statement C answers the question as to why India did not face the worst effects of recession. Hence, C follows. 'RBI and SEBI' stated in C serve as an antecedent for 'had it not been for them' stated in statement A, making C and A a mandatory pair, with statement A following statement C.
    'Have had their hands tied down' stated in A serves as an antecedent for 'this could have' stated in statement D. D follows A because it answers as to what helped Indian Banks avert losses during recession. Hence, D follows.
  • Question 4/5
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Rearrange the following six sentences, (A), (B), (C), (D), (E) and (F), in a proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph, then answer the questions that follow.
    (A) Had it been not for them, Indian banks would have had their hands tied down.
    (B) Today, almost all the countries are facing the heat of recession.
    (C) One of these is the strict RBI and SEBI rules which regulated banking sector very efficiently.
    (D) This could have led to massive losses to them, which could have percolated to other sectors as well.
    (E) However, there are a few things which helped India in bouncing back from the state of recession.
    (F) Like others, India too has not been immune to the epidemic.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following sentences should be the SIXTH after rearrangement?
    Solutions
    The correct logical order is BFECAD.
    While arranging sentences in a sequence, it is essential to understand the central theme first so that the related subthemes can be arranged accordingly. The first statement should be B which introduces the issue being discussed, which is the 'state of recession', a condition almost all countries are facing.
    Next should be statement F which talks about recession in the Indian context i.e. India has been affected as well but not as much as other countries.
    F should be followed by statement E which describes what separates India from other countries and helped her overcome the issue. This statement states 'a few things' which acts as an antecedent for 'one of these' stated in statement C. Also, statement C answers the question as to why India did not face the worst effects of recession. Hence, C follows. 'RBI and SEBI' stated in C serve as an antecedent for 'had it not been for them' stated in statement A, making C and A a mandatory pair, with statement A following statement C.
    'Have had their hands tied down' stated in A serves as an antecedent for 'this could have' stated in statement D. D follows A because it answers as to what helped Indian Banks avert losses during recession. Hence, D follows.
  • Question 5/5
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Rearrange the following six sentences, (A), (B), (C), (D), (E) and (F), in a proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph, then answer the questions that follow.
    (A) Had it been not for them, Indian banks would have had their hands tied down.
    (B) Today, almost all the countries are facing the heat of recession.
    (C) One of these is the strict RBI and SEBI rules which regulated banking sector very efficiently.
    (D) This could have led to massive losses to them, which could have percolated to other sectors as well.
    (E) However, there are a few things which helped India in bouncing back from the state of recession.
    (F) Like others, India too has not been immune to the epidemic.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following sentences should be the FIFTH after rearrangement?
    Solutions
    The correct logical order is BFECAD.
    While arranging sentences in a sequence, it is essential to understand the central theme first so that the related subthemes can be arranged accordingly. The first statement should be B which introduces the issue being discussed, which is the 'state of recession', a condition almost all countries are facing.
    Next should be statement F which talks about recession in the Indian context i.e. India has been affected as well but not as much as other countries.
    F should be followed by statement E which describes what separates India from other countries and helped her overcome the issue. This statement states 'a few things' which acts as an antecedent for 'one of these' stated in statement C. Also, statement C answers the question as to why India did not face the worst effects of recession. Hence, C follows. 'RBI and SEBI' stated in C serve as an antecedent for 'had it not been for them' stated in statement A, making C and A a mandatory pair, with statement A following statement C.
    'Have had their hands tied down' stated in A serves as an antecedent for 'this could have' stated in statement D. D follows A because it answers as to what helped Indian Banks avert losses during recession. Hence, D follows.
Close button icon
User Profile
-

Correct (-)

Wrong (-)

Skipped (-)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mockers logo Get latest Exam Updates
& Study Material Alerts!
No, Thanks
Arrow pointer icon
Click on Allow to receive notifications
Notification bell icon ×
Open Now