Please wait...

SBI Clerk Main 2022 General English Test - 1
Menu grid icon
Result Result point icon
SBI Clerk Main 2022 General English Test - 1
  • Goals icon

    /

    Score
  • Trophy icon

    -

    Rank
White alarm icon Time Taken: -
Result frame illustration
  • Question 1/10
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the these.

    The surprise decision by Ash Barty, Australia’s three-time grand-slam winner, to retire from tennis at the age of 25 has provoked much consternation. One commentator even suggested it was indicative of a different attitude towards the work-life balance among millennials. But Ms Barty is far from the first tennis player to quit the sport in her prime.

    Bjorn Borg was one of the sport’s greats, winning five consecutive Wimbledon titles and six French championships. Born in 1956, he was very much a “baby boomer”. But he quit tennis at the age of 26 in 1983, having lost the desire to keep playing (he made a short and unsuccessful comeback in the early 1990s). Martina Hingis, a Swiss player with five grand-slam titles, initially retired from the singles tour at just 22 in 2003.

    Perhaps Ms Barty’s retirement came as such a shock because the recent trend has been for tennis players to keep going. The big three in the men’s game—Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic—are 40, 35 and 34 respectively, while Sir Andy Murray is attempting a comeback at 34. On the women’s side, 40-year-old Serena Williams has yet to announce her retirement, although she hasn’t played since last year’s Wimbledon.

    Clearly the competitive urge in some athletes is so strong that they choose to play even when they have earned millions and won every conceivable honour. As for the big three, their rivalry may be keeping them going. After winning the Australian Open in January, Mr Nadal has 21 grand slam titles while Mr Federer and Mr Djokovic have 20 each. To finish ahead of the other two might be the crowning achievement for any of them.

    But it is easy to imagine that, for other mortals, success may be almost as great a spur to retire as failure. A couple of tennis grand slams brings financial security for life, plus the scope to keep busy as a media commentator. Tennis involves endless hours of practice and fitness training, as well as ceaseless travel round the globe. Often, a successful tennis player will have started the sport at a very young age and will have had little time to do anything else. Ms Barty had achieved her dream of winning both Wimbledon and her own country’s tournament, the Australian Open; perhaps she had no further goal to drive her forward?

    The most likely reason for retirement in many sports is injury. Sandy Koufax, an outstanding baseball pitcher, retired in 1966 at the relatively young age of 30, having just won his third Cy Young award for best pitcher. He gave up in the face of crippling arthritis which had dogged him for the previous two years. “I don’t regret for one minute the 12 years I’ve spent in baseball,” he said, “but I could regret one season too many.” More recently, Andrew Luck, the quarterback of the Indianapolis Colts, retired at 29 after a long series of injuries that included a torn shoulder, a lacerated kidney and a nagging ankle problem.

    Physical-contact sports like American football or rugby result in a vast range of injuries. But a non-contact sport like tennis still makes enormous demands of the body. Sir Andy now has a metal hip; Mr Nadal has suffered a long series of injuries, in particular to his left foot; Mr Federer has had back problems and, in recent years, has needed operations on his knees. The scrambling, stretching and chasing involved in tennis puts a lot of strain on the joints. Indeed, the sport has a particular injury (tennis elbow) named after it. The real surprise is not that some stars retire early; it is that they keep going so long.

    ...view full instructions


    In this line, “it was indicative of a different attitude towards the work-life balance among millennials” the commentator assumes that:

    Solutions

    The phrase “work-life balance” suggests that the millennials see them as two separate entities between which a balance must be struck. Hence, the correct answer is A.

     

  • Question 2/10
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the these.

    The surprise decision by Ash Barty, Australia’s three-time grand-slam winner, to retire from tennis at the age of 25 has provoked much consternation. One commentator even suggested it was indicative of a different attitude towards the work-life balance among millennials. But Ms Barty is far from the first tennis player to quit the sport in her prime.

    Bjorn Borg was one of the sport’s greats, winning five consecutive Wimbledon titles and six French championships. Born in 1956, he was very much a “baby boomer”. But he quit tennis at the age of 26 in 1983, having lost the desire to keep playing (he made a short and unsuccessful comeback in the early 1990s). Martina Hingis, a Swiss player with five grand-slam titles, initially retired from the singles tour at just 22 in 2003.

    Perhaps Ms Barty’s retirement came as such a shock because the recent trend has been for tennis players to keep going. The big three in the men’s game—Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic—are 40, 35 and 34 respectively, while Sir Andy Murray is attempting a comeback at 34. On the women’s side, 40-year-old Serena Williams has yet to announce her retirement, although she hasn’t played since last year’s Wimbledon.

    Clearly the competitive urge in some athletes is so strong that they choose to play even when they have earned millions and won every conceivable honour. As for the big three, their rivalry may be keeping them going. After winning the Australian Open in January, Mr Nadal has 21 grand slam titles while Mr Federer and Mr Djokovic have 20 each. To finish ahead of the other two might be the crowning achievement for any of them.

    But it is easy to imagine that, for other mortals, success may be almost as great a spur to retire as failure. A couple of tennis grand slams brings financial security for life, plus the scope to keep busy as a media commentator. Tennis involves endless hours of practice and fitness training, as well as ceaseless travel round the globe. Often, a successful tennis player will have started the sport at a very young age and will have had little time to do anything else. Ms Barty had achieved her dream of winning both Wimbledon and her own country’s tournament, the Australian Open; perhaps she had no further goal to drive her forward?

    The most likely reason for retirement in many sports is injury. Sandy Koufax, an outstanding baseball pitcher, retired in 1966 at the relatively young age of 30, having just won his third Cy Young award for best pitcher. He gave up in the face of crippling arthritis which had dogged him for the previous two years. “I don’t regret for one minute the 12 years I’ve spent in baseball,” he said, “but I could regret one season too many.” More recently, Andrew Luck, the quarterback of the Indianapolis Colts, retired at 29 after a long series of injuries that included a torn shoulder, a lacerated kidney and a nagging ankle problem.

    Physical-contact sports like American football or rugby result in a vast range of injuries. But a non-contact sport like tennis still makes enormous demands of the body. Sir Andy now has a metal hip; Mr Nadal has suffered a long series of injuries, in particular to his left foot; Mr Federer has had back problems and, in recent years, has needed operations on his knees. The scrambling, stretching and chasing involved in tennis puts a lot of strain on the joints. Indeed, the sport has a particular injury (tennis elbow) named after it. The real surprise is not that some stars retire early; it is that they keep going so long.

    ...view full instructions


    Which of the following is/are correctly inferred from the given passage?

    I. Ash Barty quit tennis due to the lack of victories.

    II. Ash Barty had disappointed many people by quitting tennis.

    III. No one had foreseen Ash Barty's retirement.

    Solutions

    Only options II & III are correct. The reasons are as follows:

    I: Ash Barty was “Australia’s three-time grand-slam winner” and “had achieved her dream of winning both Wimbledon and her own country’s tournament, the Australian Open”. Clearly, there was no lack of victories. So, option I is false.

    II: Consternation means a feeling of strong annoyance and anger, usually because of something bad that you cannot change or that is completely unexpected. Since Barty's quitting resulted in a consternation, clearly many people were disappointed that she was retiring. So, option II is true.

    III: The passage describes Barty's retirement as a “surprise decision”. Clearly her plans were known to the general public. So, option III is true.

     

  • Question 3/10
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the these.

    The surprise decision by Ash Barty, Australia’s three-time grand-slam winner, to retire from tennis at the age of 25 has provoked much consternation. One commentator even suggested it was indicative of a different attitude towards the work-life balance among millennials. But Ms Barty is far from the first tennis player to quit the sport in her prime.

    Bjorn Borg was one of the sport’s greats, winning five consecutive Wimbledon titles and six French championships. Born in 1956, he was very much a “baby boomer”. But he quit tennis at the age of 26 in 1983, having lost the desire to keep playing (he made a short and unsuccessful comeback in the early 1990s). Martina Hingis, a Swiss player with five grand-slam titles, initially retired from the singles tour at just 22 in 2003.

    Perhaps Ms Barty’s retirement came as such a shock because the recent trend has been for tennis players to keep going. The big three in the men’s game—Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic—are 40, 35 and 34 respectively, while Sir Andy Murray is attempting a comeback at 34. On the women’s side, 40-year-old Serena Williams has yet to announce her retirement, although she hasn’t played since last year’s Wimbledon.

    Clearly the competitive urge in some athletes is so strong that they choose to play even when they have earned millions and won every conceivable honour. As for the big three, their rivalry may be keeping them going. After winning the Australian Open in January, Mr Nadal has 21 grand slam titles while Mr Federer and Mr Djokovic have 20 each. To finish ahead of the other two might be the crowning achievement for any of them.

    But it is easy to imagine that, for other mortals, success may be almost as great a spur to retire as failure. A couple of tennis grand slams brings financial security for life, plus the scope to keep busy as a media commentator. Tennis involves endless hours of practice and fitness training, as well as ceaseless travel round the globe. Often, a successful tennis player will have started the sport at a very young age and will have had little time to do anything else. Ms Barty had achieved her dream of winning both Wimbledon and her own country’s tournament, the Australian Open; perhaps she had no further goal to drive her forward?

    The most likely reason for retirement in many sports is injury. Sandy Koufax, an outstanding baseball pitcher, retired in 1966 at the relatively young age of 30, having just won his third Cy Young award for best pitcher. He gave up in the face of crippling arthritis which had dogged him for the previous two years. “I don’t regret for one minute the 12 years I’ve spent in baseball,” he said, “but I could regret one season too many.” More recently, Andrew Luck, the quarterback of the Indianapolis Colts, retired at 29 after a long series of injuries that included a torn shoulder, a lacerated kidney and a nagging ankle problem.

    Physical-contact sports like American football or rugby result in a vast range of injuries. But a non-contact sport like tennis still makes enormous demands of the body. Sir Andy now has a metal hip; Mr Nadal has suffered a long series of injuries, in particular to his left foot; Mr Federer has had back problems and, in recent years, has needed operations on his knees. The scrambling, stretching and chasing involved in tennis puts a lot of strain on the joints. Indeed, the sport has a particular injury (tennis elbow) named after it. The real surprise is not that some stars retire early; it is that they keep going so long.

    ...view full instructions


    What does the phrase “other mortals”, as used in paragraph 5, refer to?

    I. Tennis players who have retired early.

    II. Tennis players other than the "big three".

    III. Tennis players other than Serena Williams.

    IV. Tennis players who are not at the top of their game.

    Solutions

    Only options II, III and IV are true. The two passages prior to passage 5 mention the "big three" (Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic) and Serena Williams along with the fact that they're still playing despite their age. The author implies that they're at the top of their careers. Anyone who doesn't fulfil these criteria is referred to as the "other mortals". Hence, the correct answer is D.

     

  • Question 4/10
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the these.

    The surprise decision by Ash Barty, Australia’s three-time grand-slam winner, to retire from tennis at the age of 25 has provoked much consternation. One commentator even suggested it was indicative of a different attitude towards the work-life balance among millennials. But Ms Barty is far from the first tennis player to quit the sport in her prime.

    Bjorn Borg was one of the sport’s greats, winning five consecutive Wimbledon titles and six French championships. Born in 1956, he was very much a “baby boomer”. But he quit tennis at the age of 26 in 1983, having lost the desire to keep playing (he made a short and unsuccessful comeback in the early 1990s). Martina Hingis, a Swiss player with five grand-slam titles, initially retired from the singles tour at just 22 in 2003.

    Perhaps Ms Barty’s retirement came as such a shock because the recent trend has been for tennis players to keep going. The big three in the men’s game—Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic—are 40, 35 and 34 respectively, while Sir Andy Murray is attempting a comeback at 34. On the women’s side, 40-year-old Serena Williams has yet to announce her retirement, although she hasn’t played since last year’s Wimbledon.

    Clearly the competitive urge in some athletes is so strong that they choose to play even when they have earned millions and won every conceivable honour. As for the big three, their rivalry may be keeping them going. After winning the Australian Open in January, Mr Nadal has 21 grand slam titles while Mr Federer and Mr Djokovic have 20 each. To finish ahead of the other two might be the crowning achievement for any of them.

    But it is easy to imagine that, for other mortals, success may be almost as great a spur to retire as failure. A couple of tennis grand slams brings financial security for life, plus the scope to keep busy as a media commentator. Tennis involves endless hours of practice and fitness training, as well as ceaseless travel round the globe. Often, a successful tennis player will have started the sport at a very young age and will have had little time to do anything else. Ms Barty had achieved her dream of winning both Wimbledon and her own country’s tournament, the Australian Open; perhaps she had no further goal to drive her forward?

    The most likely reason for retirement in many sports is injury. Sandy Koufax, an outstanding baseball pitcher, retired in 1966 at the relatively young age of 30, having just won his third Cy Young award for best pitcher. He gave up in the face of crippling arthritis which had dogged him for the previous two years. “I don’t regret for one minute the 12 years I’ve spent in baseball,” he said, “but I could regret one season too many.” More recently, Andrew Luck, the quarterback of the Indianapolis Colts, retired at 29 after a long series of injuries that included a torn shoulder, a lacerated kidney and a nagging ankle problem.

    Physical-contact sports like American football or rugby result in a vast range of injuries. But a non-contact sport like tennis still makes enormous demands of the body. Sir Andy now has a metal hip; Mr Nadal has suffered a long series of injuries, in particular to his left foot; Mr Federer has had back problems and, in recent years, has needed operations on his knees. The scrambling, stretching and chasing involved in tennis puts a lot of strain on the joints. Indeed, the sport has a particular injury (tennis elbow) named after it. The real surprise is not that some stars retire early; it is that they keep going so long.

    ...view full instructions


    Which of the following factors contribute to tennis players continuing to play?

    Solutions

    The paragraph has framed “ceaseless travel round the globe” and a growing list of injuries as a side effect of being a tennis player. These should not convince a player to continue this profession. Having achieved "financial security" is seen as a good incentive to retire.

    However, the author states that “...their rivalry may be keeping them going,”, implying that high competitiveness among the players, especially those at the top, will push them to continue to play. Hence, the correct answer is B.

     

  • Question 5/10
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the these.

    The surprise decision by Ash Barty, Australia’s three-time grand-slam winner, to retire from tennis at the age of 25 has provoked much consternation. One commentator even suggested it was indicative of a different attitude towards the work-life balance among millennials. But Ms Barty is far from the first tennis player to quit the sport in her prime.

    Bjorn Borg was one of the sport’s greats, winning five consecutive Wimbledon titles and six French championships. Born in 1956, he was very much a “baby boomer”. But he quit tennis at the age of 26 in 1983, having lost the desire to keep playing (he made a short and unsuccessful comeback in the early 1990s). Martina Hingis, a Swiss player with five grand-slam titles, initially retired from the singles tour at just 22 in 2003.

    Perhaps Ms Barty’s retirement came as such a shock because the recent trend has been for tennis players to keep going. The big three in the men’s game—Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic—are 40, 35 and 34 respectively, while Sir Andy Murray is attempting a comeback at 34. On the women’s side, 40-year-old Serena Williams has yet to announce her retirement, although she hasn’t played since last year’s Wimbledon.

    Clearly the competitive urge in some athletes is so strong that they choose to play even when they have earned millions and won every conceivable honour. As for the big three, their rivalry may be keeping them going. After winning the Australian Open in January, Mr Nadal has 21 grand slam titles while Mr Federer and Mr Djokovic have 20 each. To finish ahead of the other two might be the crowning achievement for any of them.

    But it is easy to imagine that, for other mortals, success may be almost as great a spur to retire as failure. A couple of tennis grand slams brings financial security for life, plus the scope to keep busy as a media commentator. Tennis involves endless hours of practice and fitness training, as well as ceaseless travel round the globe. Often, a successful tennis player will have started the sport at a very young age and will have had little time to do anything else. Ms Barty had achieved her dream of winning both Wimbledon and her own country’s tournament, the Australian Open; perhaps she had no further goal to drive her forward?

    The most likely reason for retirement in many sports is injury. Sandy Koufax, an outstanding baseball pitcher, retired in 1966 at the relatively young age of 30, having just won his third Cy Young award for best pitcher. He gave up in the face of crippling arthritis which had dogged him for the previous two years. “I don’t regret for one minute the 12 years I’ve spent in baseball,” he said, “but I could regret one season too many.” More recently, Andrew Luck, the quarterback of the Indianapolis Colts, retired at 29 after a long series of injuries that included a torn shoulder, a lacerated kidney and a nagging ankle problem.

    Physical-contact sports like American football or rugby result in a vast range of injuries. But a non-contact sport like tennis still makes enormous demands of the body. Sir Andy now has a metal hip; Mr Nadal has suffered a long series of injuries, in particular to his left foot; Mr Federer has had back problems and, in recent years, has needed operations on his knees. The scrambling, stretching and chasing involved in tennis puts a lot of strain on the joints. Indeed, the sport has a particular injury (tennis elbow) named after it. The real surprise is not that some stars retire early; it is that they keep going so long.

    ...view full instructions


    Given below is a possible inference that can be drawn from the facts stated in the second paragraph. You have to examine the inference in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.

    “Tennis players often quit when they lose their desire to keep playing.”

    Solutions

    In the second paragraph, only Bjorn Borg is said to had quit due to “having lost the desire to keep playing”. We don’t know why Martina Hingis, the other player mentioned in the paragraph, quit. We don't have adequate data to verify this inference. Hence, the correct answer is C.

     

  • Question 6/10
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the these.

    The surprise decision by Ash Barty, Australia’s three-time grand-slam winner, to retire from tennis at the age of 25 has provoked much consternation. One commentator even suggested it was indicative of a different attitude towards the work-life balance among millennials. But Ms Barty is far from the first tennis player to quit the sport in her prime.

    Bjorn Borg was one of the sport’s greats, winning five consecutive Wimbledon titles and six French championships. Born in 1956, he was very much a “baby boomer”. But he quit tennis at the age of 26 in 1983, having lost the desire to keep playing (he made a short and unsuccessful comeback in the early 1990s). Martina Hingis, a Swiss player with five grand-slam titles, initially retired from the singles tour at just 22 in 2003.

    Perhaps Ms Barty’s retirement came as such a shock because the recent trend has been for tennis players to keep going. The big three in the men’s game—Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic—are 40, 35 and 34 respectively, while Sir Andy Murray is attempting a comeback at 34. On the women’s side, 40-year-old Serena Williams has yet to announce her retirement, although she hasn’t played since last year’s Wimbledon.

    Clearly the competitive urge in some athletes is so strong that they choose to play even when they have earned millions and won every conceivable honour. As for the big three, their rivalry may be keeping them going. After winning the Australian Open in January, Mr Nadal has 21 grand slam titles while Mr Federer and Mr Djokovic have 20 each. To finish ahead of the other two might be the crowning achievement for any of them.

    But it is easy to imagine that, for other mortals, success may be almost as great a spur to retire as failure. A couple of tennis grand slams brings financial security for life, plus the scope to keep busy as a media commentator. Tennis involves endless hours of practice and fitness training, as well as ceaseless travel round the globe. Often, a successful tennis player will have started the sport at a very young age and will have had little time to do anything else. Ms Barty had achieved her dream of winning both Wimbledon and her own country’s tournament, the Australian Open; perhaps she had no further goal to drive her forward?

    The most likely reason for retirement in many sports is injury. Sandy Koufax, an outstanding baseball pitcher, retired in 1966 at the relatively young age of 30, having just won his third Cy Young award for best pitcher. He gave up in the face of crippling arthritis which had dogged him for the previous two years. “I don’t regret for one minute the 12 years I’ve spent in baseball,” he said, “but I could regret one season too many.” More recently, Andrew Luck, the quarterback of the Indianapolis Colts, retired at 29 after a long series of injuries that included a torn shoulder, a lacerated kidney and a nagging ankle problem.

    Physical-contact sports like American football or rugby result in a vast range of injuries. But a non-contact sport like tennis still makes enormous demands of the body. Sir Andy now has a metal hip; Mr Nadal has suffered a long series of injuries, in particular to his left foot; Mr Federer has had back problems and, in recent years, has needed operations on his knees. The scrambling, stretching and chasing involved in tennis puts a lot of strain on the joints. Indeed, the sport has a particular injury (tennis elbow) named after it. The real surprise is not that some stars retire early; it is that they keep going so long.

    ...view full instructions


    Which of the following correctly explains the meaning of the idiom, “in the face of”, as mentioned in the passage?

    Solutions

    If you take a particular action or attitude in the face of a problem or difficulty, you respond to that problem or difficulty in that way. Hence, the correct answer is E.

     

  • Question 7/10
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the these.

    The surprise decision by Ash Barty, Australia’s three-time grand-slam winner, to retire from tennis at the age of 25 has provoked much consternation. One commentator even suggested it was indicative of a different attitude towards the work-life balance among millennials. But Ms Barty is far from the first tennis player to quit the sport in her prime.

    Bjorn Borg was one of the sport’s greats, winning five consecutive Wimbledon titles and six French championships. Born in 1956, he was very much a “baby boomer”. But he quit tennis at the age of 26 in 1983, having lost the desire to keep playing (he made a short and unsuccessful comeback in the early 1990s). Martina Hingis, a Swiss player with five grand-slam titles, initially retired from the singles tour at just 22 in 2003.

    Perhaps Ms Barty’s retirement came as such a shock because the recent trend has been for tennis players to keep going. The big three in the men’s game—Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic—are 40, 35 and 34 respectively, while Sir Andy Murray is attempting a comeback at 34. On the women’s side, 40-year-old Serena Williams has yet to announce her retirement, although she hasn’t played since last year’s Wimbledon.

    Clearly the competitive urge in some athletes is so strong that they choose to play even when they have earned millions and won every conceivable honour. As for the big three, their rivalry may be keeping them going. After winning the Australian Open in January, Mr Nadal has 21 grand slam titles while Mr Federer and Mr Djokovic have 20 each. To finish ahead of the other two might be the crowning achievement for any of them.

    But it is easy to imagine that, for other mortals, success may be almost as great a spur to retire as failure. A couple of tennis grand slams brings financial security for life, plus the scope to keep busy as a media commentator. Tennis involves endless hours of practice and fitness training, as well as ceaseless travel round the globe. Often, a successful tennis player will have started the sport at a very young age and will have had little time to do anything else. Ms Barty had achieved her dream of winning both Wimbledon and her own country’s tournament, the Australian Open; perhaps she had no further goal to drive her forward?

    The most likely reason for retirement in many sports is injury. Sandy Koufax, an outstanding baseball pitcher, retired in 1966 at the relatively young age of 30, having just won his third Cy Young award for best pitcher. He gave up in the face of crippling arthritis which had dogged him for the previous two years. “I don’t regret for one minute the 12 years I’ve spent in baseball,” he said, “but I could regret one season too many.” More recently, Andrew Luck, the quarterback of the Indianapolis Colts, retired at 29 after a long series of injuries that included a torn shoulder, a lacerated kidney and a nagging ankle problem.

    Physical-contact sports like American football or rugby result in a vast range of injuries. But a non-contact sport like tennis still makes enormous demands of the body. Sir Andy now has a metal hip; Mr Nadal has suffered a long series of injuries, in particular to his left foot; Mr Federer has had back problems and, in recent years, has needed operations on his knees. The scrambling, stretching and chasing involved in tennis puts a lot of strain on the joints. Indeed, the sport has a particular injury (tennis elbow) named after it. The real surprise is not that some stars retire early; it is that they keep going so long.

    ...view full instructions


    Which of the following statement (s) is/are NOT TRUE in accordance with the information provided in the passage?

    I. Non-contact sports players have a less chance of getting injured.

    II. Sandy Koufax quit as he had won the Cy Young award for best pitcher.

    III. The position of a media commentator is often by the retired tennis players.

    Solutions

    Only option III is correct. The reasons are as follows:

    I: “The scrambling, stretching and chasing involved in tennis puts a lot of strain on the joints. Indeed, the sport has a particular injury (tennis elbow) named after it.” This shows that non-contact sports players have equal chances of getting injured as compared to contact sports players. So, option I is false.

    II: Koufax “...gave up in the face of crippling arthritis which had dogged him for the previous two years”, not because he had won his third Cy Young award for best pitcher. So, option II is false.

    III: After retirement, tennis players have a lot of free time on their hands. “To keep busy”, they become media commentators. So, option III is true.

     

  • Question 8/10
    1 / -0.25

    In the given questions, one statement with a blank is given along with four words. Two of the given words can fit into the given blank. Five options with various combinations of these words are given. Pick up the combination of the words that fits into the blank.

    Virtual reality (VR) systems are increasingly being _____________ to help people with agoraphobia – those for whom certain environments, situations and interactions can cause intense fear and distress.

    a) Designed

    b) Created

    c) Writing

    d) Lesson

    Solutions

    The blank needs to be filled by the past participle form of the verb to complement the preceding auxiliary ‘being’ and form the simple past. This leaves ‘designed’ and ‘created’ as probable choices, both of which imply the idea that something new is being developed. Thus, option C is the correct answer.

     

  • Question 9/10
    1 / -0.25

    In the given questions, one statement with a blank is given along with four words. Two of the given words can fit into the given blank. Five options with various combinations of these words are given. Pick up the combination of the words that fits into the blank.

    The largest genetic study of Alzheimer’s to date has provided _____________ evidence linking the disease to disruption in the brain’s immune system.

    a) Compiling

    b) Compelling

    c) Potent

    d) Likelihood

    Solutions

    Since the sentence is talking about scientific evidence, it needs to be significant, or fool proof. Furthermore, the blank needs to be filled by an adjective for ‘evidence’. This leaves participles as probable choices.

    Consider the meanings of the given words:

    compiling: collecting information from different places and arranging it in a book, report, or list.

    likelihood: the chance that something will happen.

    compelling: If a reason, argument, etc. is compelling, it makes you believe it or accept it because it is so strong.

    potent: very powerful, forceful, or effective.

    Among the given choices, then, only ‘potent’ and ‘compelling’ can be used in the blank to make the sentence grammatically and contextually correct.

     

  • Question 10/10
    1 / -0.25

    In the given questions, one statement with a blank is given along with four words. Two of the given words can fit into the given blank. Five options with various combinations of these words are given. Pick up the combination of the words that fits into the blank.

    Reaching 1.5C of global heating is now pretty much inevitable, and we will _____________ it somewhere around 2035, no matter what we do.

    a) Touch

    b) Reached

    c) Reach

    d) Touching

    Solutions

    the blank needs to be filled with the base form of the verb to complement ‘will’ and form the simple future tense. This leaves ‘reach’ and ‘attain’ as probable choices, making option C the correct answer.

     

Close button icon
User Profile
-

Correct (-)

Wrong (-)

Skipped (-)


  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Mockers logo Get latest Exam Updates
& Study Material Alerts!
No, Thanks
Arrow pointer icon
Click on Allow to receive notifications
Notification bell icon ×
Open Now