The possible Venn Diagram is -

Conclusions:

I. All Devotees can never be Prayers.  → False (All Mosques can never be Prayers but All Devotees can be Prayers. So, this conclusion doesn't follow.)

II. All Mosques can be Temples. → True (As there is no negative relation between Temple and Mosque, All mosques are Temples is a possibility. So, this conclusion follows.)

Hence, the correct answer is Only conclusion II follows.

The least possible Venn diagram according to the above statement is:

Conclusion:

I. All Symbols being Word is a possibility → False (All Paragraphs are Symbols and Some Paragraphs are not Words as only a few Paragraphs are Words, Hence all Symbols being words will be definitely false.)

II. All Word are Symbols → False (All Word being Symbols is a possibility but its not definite as shown in the least possible diagram.)

III.  Some Paragraph are not Word is a possibility → False (Some Paragraphs are not Words is definite, hence the possibility will be false.)

Hence, None follows is the correct answer.

We have information about nine employees working in a company with different years of work experience.

The Base year is 2024.

1) Two fewer people joined after Bhuvan than before him. According to this statement, the only possible case for Bhuvan is that he joined in the year 2007.

2) Lokesh's working experience in the company are a prime number. Possible working years of Lokesh could be 29, 23, and 17. But, the Bhuvan has experience of 17 years. So, the only possible working years for Lokesh could be 29 and 23.

3) Piyush does not have experience which is a multiple of 3. So, the only possibility is Piyush having experience of 34 years.  Aakash is more senior than Lokesh but is not the senior most.

4) One person joined between Akash and Kamal. There is the same number of persons joined between Aakash and Raghav as between Piyush and Kamal.

5) Naman has an even number of experience but joined after 2009.  Manoj is just senior to Saroj. Combining the information of these two sentences Naman would have joined in 2018, then only Manoj and Saroj could be placed in such a way that Saroj joined just after Manoj.

The final arrangement is:

Piyush has experience of 34 years and Kamal has experience of 23 years. Hence, the difference between the working experience of Piyush and Kamal is 11 years.

We have information about nine employees working in a company with different years of work experience.

The Base year is 2024.

1) Two fewer people joined after Bhuvan than before him. According to this statement, the only possible case for Bhuvan is that he joined in the year 2007.

2) Lokesh's working experience in the company are a prime number. Possible working years of Lokesh could be 29, 23, and 17. But, the Bhuvan has experience of 17 years. So, the only possible working years for Lokesh could be 29 and 23.

3) Piyush does not have experience which is a multiple of 3. So, the only possibility is Piyush having experience of 34 years.  Aakash is more senior than Lokesh but is not the senior most.

4) One person joined between Akash and Kamal. There is the same number of persons joined between Aakash and Raghav as between Piyush and Kamal.

5) Naman has an even number of experience but joined after 2009.  Manoj is just senior to Saroj. Combining the information of these two sentences Naman would have joined in 2018, then only Manoj and Saroj could be placed in such a way that Saroj joined just after Manoj.

The final arrangement is:

Hence, Naman has the least experience.

We have information about nine employees working in a company with different years of work experience.

The Base year is 2024.

1) Two fewer people joined after Bhuvan than before him. According to this statement, the only possible case for Bhuvan is that he joined in the year 2007.

2) Lokesh's working experience in the company are a prime number. Possible working years of Lokesh could be 29, 23, and 17. But, the Bhuvan has experience of 17 years. So, the only possible working years for Lokesh could be 29 and 23.

3) Piyush does not have experience which is a multiple of 3. So, the only possibility is Piyush having experience of 34 years.  Aakash is more senior than Lokesh but is not the senior most.

4) One person joined between Akash and Kamal. There is the same number of persons joined between Aakash and Raghav as between Piyush and Kamal.

5) Naman has an even number of experience but joined after 2009.  Manoj is just senior to Saroj. Combining the information of these two sentences Naman would have joined in 2018, then only Manoj and Saroj could be placed in such a way that Saroj joined just after Manoj.

The final arrangement is:

Hence, Bhuvan joined the company in the year 2007.

We have information about nine employees working in a company with different years of work experience.

The Base year is 2024.

1) Two fewer people joined after Bhuvan than before him. According to this statement, the only possible case for Bhuvan is that he joined in the year 2007.

2) Lokesh's working experience in the company are a prime number. Possible working years of Lokesh could be 29, 23, and 17. But, the Bhuvan has experience of 17 years. So, the only possible working years for Lokesh could be 29 and 23.

3) Piyush does not have experience which is a multiple of 3. So, the only possibility is Piyush having experience of 34 years.  Aakash is more senior than Lokesh but is not the senior most.

4) One person joined between Akash and Kamal. There is the same number of persons joined between Aakash and Raghav as between Piyush and Kamal.

5) Naman has an even number of experience but joined after 2009.  Manoj is just senior to Saroj. Combining the information of these two sentences Naman would have joined in 2018, then only Manoj and Saroj could be placed in such a way that Saroj joined just after Manoj.

The final arrangement is:

Saroj has experience of 9 years. Hence, Saroj experience is a perfect square number.

We have information about nine employees working in a company with different years of work experience.

The Base year is 2024.

1) Two fewer people joined after Bhuvan than before him. According to this statement, the only possible case for Bhuvan is that he joined in the year 2007.

2) Lokesh's working experience in the company are a prime number. Possible working years of Lokesh could be 29, 23, and 17. But, the Bhuvan has experience of 17 years. So, the only possible working years for Lokesh could be 29 and 23.

3) Piyush does not have experience which is a multiple of 3. So, the only possibility is Piyush having experience of 34 years.  Aakash is more senior than Lokesh but is not the senior most.

4) One person joined between Akash and Kamal. There is the same number of persons joined between Aakash and Raghav as between Piyush and Kamal.

5) Naman has an even number of experience but joined after 2009.  Manoj is just senior to Saroj. Combining the information of these two sentences Naman would have joined in 2018, then only Manoj and Saroj could be placed in such a way that Saroj joined just after Manoj.

The final arrangement is:

Bhuvan is senior to Saroj. Hence, Bhuvan is junior to Saroj is false statement.

Given:

1) C is the daughter of K.

2) J is the mother of M.

3) C is the only sibling of M, who is the brother-in-law of P. It means K is the father of C and M. We cannot determine now the relation of P as of now.

4) A is the only daughter of B, who is the grandfather of C. It means B is the father of K.

5) A is the daughter of V. It means V is the wife of B.

6) K is the father-in-law of U. 

7) K and U are of different genders. It means U is a female and the wife of M who is a male.

8) P and V are of the same gender. It means P is also a female. It means she is the sister of U.

The family tree is as follows:

U is the daughter-in-law of J.

Hence, the correct answer is Daughter-in-law.

Given:

1) C is the daughter of K.

2) J is the mother of M.

3) C is the only sibling of M, who is the brother-in-law of P. It means K is the father of C and M. We cannot determine now the relation of P as of now.

4) A is the only daughter of B, who is the grandfather of C. It means B is the father of K.

5) A is the daughter of V. It means V is the wife of B.

6) K is the father-in-law of U. 

7) K and U are of different genders. It means U is a female and the wife of M who is a male.

8) P and V are of the same gender. It means P is also a female. It means she is the sister of U.

The family tree is as follows:

If Q is the father of J then K is the son-in-law of Q.

Hence, the correct answer is K.

Given:

1) C is the daughter of K.

2) J is the mother of M.

3) C is the only sibling of M, who is the brother-in-law of P. It means K is the father of C and M. We cannot determine now the relation of P as of now.

4) A is the only daughter of B, who is the grandfather of C. It means B is the father of K.

5) A is the daughter of V. It means V is the wife of B.

6) K is the father-in-law of U. 

7) K and U are of different genders. It means U is a female and the wife of M who is a male.

8) P and V are of the same gender. It means P is also a female. It means she is the sister of U.

The family tree is as follows:

There are three married couples in the family. 

A is an unmarried person. 

J is not the Mother-in-law of V. 

Hence, the correct answer is Only II.