Please wait...
/
-
If “SEQUENCE” is coded as “HVJFVMXV” then how will “CHILDREN” be coded in the same code?
Verify mobile number to view the solution
In the following question, one or two statements is/are given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true, even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Indicate your answer.
Statements:
Conclusions:
First Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type) Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type). Some schools are laboratories. All laboratories are theatres. I + A ⇒ I-type of Conclusion “Some schools are theatres”. Conclusion I is Converse of it,
In a certain code language, “LINK” is written as “KHMJ”. How is “MASK” written in that code language?
If BROTHER is coded as GWTYMJW, then SCHOOL is coded as
In a code language, TABLEPADS is written as BADCYGAPJ. How will BACKSPACE fie written as in that language?
In a certain code language, '-' represents '+', '+' represents '×', '×' represents '÷' and '÷' represents '-'. Find out the answer to the following question.
13 ÷ 18 - 5 + 10 × 2 = ?
13 ÷ 18 - 5 + 10 × 2 = ? ⇒ ? = 13 - 18 + 5 × 10 ÷ 2 ⇒ ? = 13 - 18 + 25 ⇒ ? = 38 - 18 = 20
Consider the given statements) to be true and decide which of the given conclusions/assumptlons can definitely be drawn from the given statements).
First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type). Second Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type). Some men are stenographers. All stenographers are lazy. I + A ⇒ I-type of Conclusion “Some men are lazy”. This is Conclusion II.
In the following question, two statements are given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statements
Neither Conclusion I nor II follows. The Fundamental Rights were included into the Constitution by the Drafting Committee headed by Dr. B R Ambedkar.
Read the given statements and Conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given Conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
First Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type). Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A - type). All yellow are cars. Some cars are red. A + 1 ⇒ No Conclusion Conclusion I is the Converse of the first Premise. Conclusion III is the Converse of the second Premise.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some Conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the Conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusion logically follows the given statements.
First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type). Second Premise is Universal Negative (E-type). All cars are black. No black is shining. A + E ⇒ E-type of Conclusion “No car is shining.” This is the Conclusion II. Conclusion III is the Converse of this Conclusion.
Correct (-)
Wrong (-)
Skipped (-)