Please wait...
/
-
If L denotes ‘×’, M denotes '÷', P denotes '+' and Q denotes ‘-', then 16 P 24 M 8 Q 6 M 2 L 3?
Verify mobile number to view the solution
16 P 24 M 8 Q 6 M 2 L 3 ⇒ 16 + 24 ÷ 8 - 6 ÷ 2 × 3 ⇒ 16 + 3 - 9 = 10
In a code language, FRIEND is written as GQJDOC. How will PEACE be written in that language?
If ‘L’ stands for '+', ‘M’ stands '-', N stands for ‘×’, P stands for '÷' then
14 N 10 L 42 P 2 M 8 = ?
14 N 10 L 42 P 2 M 8 = ? ⇒ ? = 14 × 10 + 42 ÷ 2 - 8 ⇒ ? = 140 + 21 - 8 ⇒ ? = 161 - 8 = 153
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some Conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the Conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusions logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
Conclusions:
First Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type). Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type). Some cups are hot. All hot are tea. I + A ⇒ I-type of Conclusion “Some cups are tea.” Conclusion I is the Converse of it.
Two statements are given followed by three Conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the Conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Possible figures (Venn’s Diagrams) :
(II) Conclusion I follows definitely. Conclusion II and III are supplementary to each other. So, either II or III follows.
If FRIEND is coded as HUMJTK, how can CANDLE be written in that code
If GOODNESS is coded as HNPCODTR, how GREATNESS can be written in that code?
Given below are numbers in the first line and symbols in the second line. Numbers and symbols are codes for each other. Choose the correct code for given symbols.
In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some Conclusions. Taking the given statements to be hue even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the Conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusion logically follows from the given statements.
Statements I and II are Universal Affirmative (A-type). Statement III is Particular Affirmative (I-type). Some women are intelligent. All intelligent are advocates. I + A ⇒ I-type of Conclusion “Some women are advocates”. This is the Conclusion III. Conclusion I is the Converse of it. Some intelligent are women. All women are hardworking. I + A⇒ I-type of Conclusion “Some intelligent are hardworking”. Conclusion IV is the Converse of it. Conclusion II is the Converse of Statement I.
In a certain code language, ‘RIGIDS’ is written as TFIFFP’. What will be the code for ‘CORNET in that code language?
Correct (-)
Wrong (-)
Skipped (-)