Please wait...
/
-
In the following questions, two statements are given followed by two conclusions/assumptions, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true, even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Indicate your answer.
Statements:
Conclusions:
Verify mobile number to view the solution
First Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type). Second Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type). All doctors are social workers. Some social workers are politicians. A + I ⇒ No Conclusion.
In a certain code language, ‘STORED’ is written as ‘URQPGB’. What is the code for ‘POINTA’ in that code language?
In this question two statements are given, followed by two Conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given Conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement I is Universal Affirmative (A-type). Statement II is Particular Affirmative (I-type) Some breads are cakes. All cakes are pastries. I + A ⇒ I - type of Conclusion “Some breads are pastries.” This is the Conclusion II.
S is son of M. R is the father of Q and A. A is the daughter of M. How is A related to S?
In a certain code language, ‘PAGER’ is written as ‘MIDOO’. How will ‘ANGEL’ be written as in that language?
The code has been generated on the following pattern: Consonant - 3 ⇒ Code Vowel is coded by taking the second succeeding vowel. Therefore,
Two statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Venn’s diagram for given conditions :
From the Above diagram, all the conclusions follow.
In the following questions, two statements are given followed by two conclusions (I) and (II). You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statements. Indicate your answer.
First Premise m Universal Affirmative (A-type). Second Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type). All books are novels. Some novels are poems. A + I ⇒ No Conclusion Conclusion II is Converse of the second Premise.
Read the given statements and Conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given Conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Both the statements 1 and 2 are Universal Affirmative (A-type) All toys are pens. Some pens are games. A + I ⇒ No Conclusion Conclusion I and Conclusion III form Complementary Pair. Therefore, either Conclusion I or Conclusion III follows.
In this question, a word is followed by four options, one of which cannot be formed by using the letters of the given word. Find this word.
ANNIVERSARY
There is no ‘W’ letter in the given word.
Saksham introduced Nidhi to his friend, “She is the daughter of the only son of my father’s wife.” How is Saksham related to Nidhi?
Correct (-)
Wrong (-)
Skipped (-)