Verify mobile number to view the solution
Solutions
If the city was destroyed before any pottery of type 3 was made, the hypothesis that the middle layer represents a period later than that of the siege is strongly supported. The major assumptions on which this hypothesis rests are only that lower layers represent earlier time periods and that objects from a later period did not become embedded in some unusual way in layers present in earlier periods. Hypothesis A is not strongly supported since the large mound may just be the wrong place to look in. The evidence as described reveals nothing about any particular siege or episode of destruction; so neither hypothesis B nor D is supported. On balance, then, the best answer is C.